In Studio

Interesting Collaboration Site: IndabaMusic

Monday, July 7th, 2008

To begin, I know it’s been some time since I’ve posted… It’s been a busy month on several fronts, but pleased to say that I have some promising riffs coming to life inside my studio so a new tune appears to be on the horizon!  I’ve also been adjusting to my new RD700GX master controller – but I’m getting it dialed in.

In the mean time, I wanted to share a promising music collaboration site that I recently “stumbled upon”: IndabaMusic.com

This site appears to be designed around the concept of a creating Online Sessions; meaning, you create a “space” that represents a Project or Session and post your tracks with various tags allowing others to find, listen, and then join in.  You can also specify the type of tracks (and musicians) you’re looking for…  Those who join can then contribute their tracks – and you can even do the mixing online, although I don’t envision this replacing my studio tools.  I’m hoping to use Indaba to find some high-quality musicians with whom I can collaborate with & hire.  I especially like the ability to search for specific musical skills and sample previous work… you can reach out to these musicians and invite them to work on your session.  You can make your sessions either public or private, the former enables anyone in the Indaba community to listen in, comment, and/or contribute.

I’ve been struggling to find professional session musicians for sax and horns.  My music has a lot of interweaving between sax and piano, and despite having some VERY good technology, there’s no substitute for real, live-recorded wind instruments. I have drums and guitars covered courtesy of my friends at StudioPros.com, but I’d welcome an expansion of options since they don’t provide horn players, and I’d just assume do it ALL on line.

Given that music is now mostly recorded into a digital medium, a site like Indaba could really help.  Most importantly, it “appears” to have a growing membership base.  In my brief review I found it easy to search and review a wide range of talent and genres, certainly not all to my liking.  BUT, I did find some very good players, particularly in the realm of jazz guitar and sax – the authenticity and quality of these parts are critical for the kind of stuff I write…

So I think I’m going to take Indaba for a spin – best of all, you get everything you need for your first session for free! But once you need more “space” (as in gigabytes of storage space for more sessions), you pay $10 USD/mo.  Very acceptable.

Check out Indaba when you get a chance, and let me know what you think!

A bit about software samplers

Monday, June 9th, 2008

I’ve mentioned in past articles literally having thousands of sounds at my disposal; this is made possible through what is known as “sampler technology” (or more specifically, software samplers). A sampler is software that manages, well, sound samples! For example, a piano has 88-keys, so a sampled piano consists of a recording of each key on the instrument. Each key is recorded with different variations such as velocity levels (playing soft or hard), as well as other nuisances such as staccato, legato, pedal on, off, etc. So you can imagine that you end up with literally thousands of possibilities for a single instrument.

That’s sampling in a nutshell, and software samplers manage all of this, and can be triggered directly by a keyboard or thru a digital audio workstation just like any other connected instrument.

I use dedicated computers for this function… actually two dedicated samplers. The first one is a high-end PC configured to run a leading product known as Tascam GigaStudio. The second sampler is a purpose-built Linux server called a Muse Receptor that can run a wide variety of “virtual software instruments” that conform to industry standard VSTi format. In fact, the piano sound I used on the most recent tune, Seduction, was courtesy of a virtual instrument known as Ivory that runs on the Muse. It’s worthy to note that a virtual instrument is not the same as a sampler, but often provides for similar functionality (I’ll go over this more in a future post). Regardless, there are literally thousands (several gigabytes worth) of sample files organized into “sample libraries” on these boxes, and the sampling software makes them accessible as instruments – just like dedicated outboard gear! And, we’re not talking about “synthesized” sounds here… rather, samplers play back professionally recorded “samples” from real instruments. The sounds/samples of $250,000 Bosendorfer concert grand can be acquired and placed into your recordings for a fraction of the cost! So it goes without saying that sampler technology is a key component in most studios – particularly if your music incorporates acoustic instruments.

Even when you use a self-contained “digital keyboard”, it most likely uses built-in samples to play back acoustic instruments. The difference is that these samples are compressed into relatively small storage mediums such as on-board ROM chips; where as a true software-based sampler can take advantage of today’s low-cost/high-capacity disk drives and provide for virtually unlimited storage. The depth of a sample library is kind of like pixels on a television; the more you have, the higher the resolution… so think of software samplers as a bit like HDTV on steroids! Commercial sample libraries designed for software samplers often require GIGABYTES of storage, just for a single instrument, and from this density comes the authenticity. One well known professional orchestral library requires nearly 60 Gigabytes just for its baseline package… so we’re talking server-grade hardware and performance requirements, but the results are well worth it.

All but the most well-budgeted of films these days use sample libraries to some extent. You can literally be a one-person band, so to speak, if you know what you’re doing. Obviously, the technology doesn’t write the music for you, AND there is an equal craft in knowing how to “articulate” the sound so that it comes off authentically. In the end, technology will never 100% replace a real orchestra, but it comes pretty damn close these days, and for literally pennies on the dollar. I’m not sure if this is a good thing or bad thing in the grand scheme because there is truly a special magic to the “real thing”… but no question that more can be done for less, and I believe that benefits everyone in the long run.

Click here to Expand/Collapse a picture of the setup…

New Toy – Roland RD700GX Stage Piano

Monday, June 2nd, 2008

Well, I guess all the previous commentary about GAS (Gear Acquisition Syndrome) must have had a lingering affect as I succumbed this past weekend to the newly released Roland RD700GX Stage Piano/Master MIDI Controller. Suffice it to say that this is a serious piece of kit, so I’m dividing this post into two sections: an easy non-technical read and another aimed more at fellow musicians because I know there’s lots of you out there waiting to hear some early reviews before pulling the trigger!

The new Roland RD700GX installed

And my view!

Click here to Expand/Collapse the non-technical review…

Click here to Expand/Collapse the musician’s perspective…



I am a professional hobbyist when it comes to this.   Though my relationship with the piano began at a young age, I only recently pulled off the gloves to rekindle it and haven’t looked back since.   This was partly inspired by huge advancements in music production technology now available to all  – and from the comfort and privacy of your home!   I’ve never subscribed much to job titles so I won’t attempt to label my genre.  Besides, composing music mirrors life in that there are really only two ways to write a song: your way, and the wrong way. 

Thank you for your interest and encouragement.